Background Circle Background Circle

To Be or Not To Be: Why In-House Courses are a Winning Choice for Lead Auditors



In a world filled with a dizzying array of professional development options, the choice of training programs for aspiring auditors can be overwhelming. Among the plethora of options, in-house courses often get overshadowed by more renowned certification programs like PECB or IRCA. However, contrary to popular belief, in-house courses offer a variety of advantages that make them a compelling choice, especially when you consider that neither certification bodies nor accreditation agencies mandate such certifications for becoming a competent lead auditor. In this article, we will shine a spotlight on why opting for an in-house course could be a game-changer for your auditing career.


The Significant Pros


1. Tailor-Made Curriculum

One of the most significant advantages of in-house courses is the customizable curriculum. Unlike standardized courses that follow a rigid syllabus, in-house training can be tailor-made to fit the specific needs and challenges of your organization or industry. This personalization ensures that you learn exactly what is relevant for your role.

2. Cost-Effectiveness

In-house courses often prove to be a cost-effective training solution. By cutting out the middleman and eliminating many of the overhead costs associated with external training programs, companies can offer quality training at a lower price.

3. Real-World Application

In-house training allows for immediate real-world application of skills and knowledge. Because the training is closely aligned with your organization’s specific needs, it offers practical scenarios that can be instantly applied to your day-to-day work.

4. Flexibility and Convenience

In-house courses offer unmatched flexibility. Training sessions can be scheduled at convenient times, reducing the need for travel and the stress associated with balancing work, life, and professional development.

5. Team Building

In-house courses often involve training multiple members from the same organization, thereby serving as a team-building exercise. Shared learning experiences can foster better communication and teamwork among colleagues.

6. Confidentiality

Discussing real company projects and issues openly can be a sensitive matter. In-house training offers a confidential environment in which employees can discuss and resolve real challenges without the fear of information leakage.

7. Direct Relevance

Because in-house training is often designed with specific organizational goals in mind, it is generally more aligned with the business objectives, making the learning immediately applicable and relevant.

8. Focused Attention

Smaller group sizes and a more intimate setting often mean that you’ll get more individualized attention, ensuring that specific questions and challenges can be addressed promptly.

The Lesser Cons

While in-house courses have their limitations, such as potential lack of outside perspectives or the quality depending on in-house expertise, these are often overshadowed by the numerous advantages that they offer.



In the grand debate of “to be or not to be” trained via an in-house course, the scales tip decisively towards “to be.” With advantages like tailor-made curriculum, cost-effectiveness, real-world application, and team-building opportunities, in-house training stands out as an attractive option for auditors. Especially considering that they are not a mandatory requirement by certification bodies or accreditation bodies, in-house courses offer a flexible, relevant, and efficient avenue for professional development in the field of auditing.